Committee for the Republic of Canada
Comité pour la République du Canada

All sections /
Les rubriques :

Latest items /
Derniers articles :

Nature journal publishes researchers’ analysis of water found deep in the Canadian Precambrian Shield said to be at least 1.5 billion years old


Sir Bill Gates Explains His Genocidal Calculus
Former Secretary of State of the Argentine Republic : a letter to the Congress of the United States regarding the Glass-Steagall Reform
British-Saudi Apparatus Throws Tunisia Into a Major Crisis; Conflict Arises Over Ansar al-Shariah Annual Congress
Half of U.S. Area Is in Drought; as Obama Ag Incompetence Ruins Farmers and Cities Alike
Bipartisan ’Cover-up’ clouds Benghazi investigation
Glass-Steagall Introduced in the US Senate!
PM Harper addresses CFR as Keystone XL pipeline approval bill is expected to be debated in full U.S. House next week
American Senator Harkin Introduces S. 985 To Reinstate Glass-Steagall
Flash : Tom Harkin introduit le Glass-Steagall au Sénat américain
Les démocrates et la presse lâchent enfin Obama !
Friday International Webcast with Lyndon LaRouche
Under Canada’s chairmanship of the Arctic Council, China is finally granted Permanent Observer Status
Glass-Steagall is ’More Necessary than Ever’
Un anglais à Paris, un américain à Londres : Ken Loach et Cornel West ne mâchent pas leurs mots
 
Tsunami Victims and Damages Can Be Avoided, Says Italian Scientist to EIR

Printable version / Version imprimable

1 April 2011

(EIRNS) - Prof. Pier Francesco Biagi, Italy’s leading researcher on earthquake precursors, welcomed Lyndon LaRouche’s proposal to restart the U.S. National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program, and to include NASA into it. In a discussion with EIR today, he said that the original flaw must be corrected, of establishing a deadline for results. You cannot, say, as it was done for the USNEHRP, that "in ten years we will analyze results and, on the basis of that, we will decide whether the funding should continue." It must be an open-ended program: It can be that in ten years, not enough results are collected, because there is a low activity; and it can be that enough results are achieved in three years, because of high activity.

Professor Biagi stressed throughout the discussion that it is possible to detect the outbreak of earthquakes in advance, with an up to ten days’ lead time—contrary to the clique within the U.S. Geological Survey, who say the opposite.

If he were the head of NASA, and could decide on programs to finance for earthquake precursors, Biagi said, he would immediately start a "very selective program of nano-satellites." The first nano-satellite would cost 1 million euros, and each successive one 600 000 euros. This is in reality peanuts, but there is no government financing for that. The Italians tried a couple of years ago to promote a European program, but they failed.

Governments prefer to finance other programs, such as "the coupling of polar bears," he said, wryly.

There is only one nation that sent a satellite in orbit specifically for earthquake research, and that was France, with its Demeter satellite. Its data were "very interesting," Biagi pointed out.

We are definitely in a phase of high-level earthquake activity, Biagi said. It is evident that seismic cicles coincide with the sun’s activity.

Precursor research is currently done in very few countries, and these are, in order of the programs’ importance: Japan, Italy, Greece, and Russia. Those scientific groups meet regularly and coordinate their activity. Biagi works closely with Hayakawa and Molchanov, among others. The problem is that none of those programs are government-financed, and scientists must organize private financing, sometimes in quite ingenious ways.

The Italians are collecting and evaluating data detected by a network of transmitters throughout the world, which are otherwise used for other purposes. They collect data on electromagnetic activity in advance of earthquakes. They are able to forecast with ten days in advance, with a probability higher than 80%, that a major earthquake will hit a certain region. Of course, the locality cannot be indicated with absolute precision, but in about a 100 km radius.